Those who put modern studies on 'prejudice' under the microscope are already aware of their pseudo-scientific nature: tendentious and methodologically weak, they are conducted with a view to prove a pre-determined conclusion that self-servingly defines the design of the entire study. Said studies are uncritically reported in the media, of course, since they exist to serve an ideology. It took no effort to take appart the juvenile report by the Huffington Post, not least because the refutation to their claims was contained in the article itself. See for yourself how these nincompoops work by clicking here.